21. Ott MA et al., The newest change-of anywhere between hormones contraceptives and condoms certainly teens, Point of views on the Sexual and you may Reproductive Wellness, 2002, 34(1):6–14.
twenty two. Wilson EK and you can Koo Horsepower, Connectivity ranging from lowest-money ladies’ relationship functions as well as their birth-control explore, Point of views into Sexual and you may Reproductive Fitness, 2008, 40(3):171–179.
23. Aalsma MC et al., Loved ones and you may buddy closeness to adolescent sexual lovers within the relationship to condom have fun with, Journal from Teenage Health, 2006, 38(3):173–178.
24. Sayegh MA ainsi que al., New developmental organization regarding dating top quality, hormones birth control alternatives and you will condom low-play with among adolescent feminine, Record from Adolescent Health, 2006, 39(3):388–395.
twenty five. Umphrey L and you can Sherblom J, Relational commitment and you may risks so you’re able to relationship repairs desires: affects into the condom explore, Journal off American College Fitness, 2007, 56(1):61–68.
27. Manning WD ainsi que al., Young adult dating dating together with management of sexual exposure, People Research and you may Rules Remark, 2012, 31(2):165–185.
twenty eight. Manlove J ainsi que al., Teen moms and dads in the foster care: exposure circumstances and results for youthfulness and their students, Research Short term, Washington, DC: Youngster Trends, 2011.
29. DiClemente RJ mais aussi al., Sexual chance behavior of this having older sex people: an examination of black colored teenage lady, Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2002, 29(1):20–24.
thirty-two. Fortenberry JD mais aussi al., Condom use just like the a function of amount of time in the new and you may oriented teenage sexual matchmaking, American Record from Personal Wellness, 2002, 92(2):211–213.
33. Manlove JS, Ryan S and you can Franzetta K, Exposure and you may protective items in the change so you can a first sexual experience of an older partner, Log from Adolescent Health, 2007, 40(2):135–143.
34. Manlove J, Ryan S and Franzetta K, Contraception play with habits all over teens’ sexual matchmaking, paper exhibited on yearly appointment of the Society Organization out of America, Philadelphia, .
thirty five. Manning WD, Giordano Pc and you will Longmore MA, Linking: the partnership contexts regarding “nonrelationship” sex, Log regarding Teenage Research, 2006, 21(5):459–483.
36. Carlson MJ and you may Furstenberg FF, Jr, The results out of multiple-hitched virility to own adult information and dating, papers exhibited during the annual appointment of the Organization for Societal Coverage Analysis and you can Administration, Arizona, DC, .
37. Lichter DT and you may Graefe DR, Looking a pal? The brand new marital and you will cohabitation records from unwed mothers, in: Wu LL and you may Wolfe B, eds., Out-of Wedlock: Explanations and Consequences off Nonmarital Fertility, Ny: Russell Sage Basis, 2001, pp. 317–343.
forty. Kirby D, Growing Answers 2007: Search Results into Apps to minimize Adolescent Maternity and you will Sexually Transmitted Problems, Washington, DC: National Campaign to get rid of Adolescent and you will Unexpected Pregnancy, 2007.
41. Kirby D, This new impression of applications to boost birth prevention explore among mature feminine: a look at experimental and quasi-experimental education, Views towards Sexual and you may Reproductive Wellness, 2008, 40(1):34–41.
Author’s Affiliations
Jennifer Manlove was program town movie director and elderly look researcher, Kate Welti are search researcher, Age Wildsmith are elder lookup researcher and you may Megan Barry are research expert, all of the from the Youngster Fashion, Bethesda, MD.
Background
In the first research, that used a neighbor hood-town test out-of teens into the Ohio, Manning and acquaintances nine grouped matchmaking properties on you to index of confident functions (instance romantic notice-revelation, enchanting like and you can matchmaking salience) and another list away from negative attributes (such as for instance dispute and nonexclusivity). It unearthed that high results to the often list was indeed of the shorter condom structure. Detailed analyses in addition to suggested you to definitely a mix of highest self-confident and you will higher negative score try in the faster condom surface.
From inside the for each and every bullet, users was indeed questioned « As big date regarding past interview, have you been inside the a matchmaking relationship in which you think off your self within two? » I felt participants to stay an internet dating relationship if they replied sure just in case the new partner is a recently available dating companion, as opposed to a spouse, cohabiting companion otherwise previous companion. Same-sex dating matchmaking and the ones where in actuality the respondent had before cohabited into the spouse was indeed omitted. Total, 4,013 participants said a current relationship relationship during 2002–2005. Of your remaining participants, 553 just weren’t regarding the test within the rounds of interest, 1,876 was indeed cohabiting or partnered, and 2,542 didn’t come with current matchmaking dating. Respondents inside our sample was indeed old 18–twenty six.
Relationship commitment is actually according to one or two methods. The first was a 0–10 level in which respondents ranked the chance that they and you may its companion might possibly be to one another when you look at the half a year. A get out-of zero shown not a way; a great ten conveyed 100% probability. I categorized that it possibilities given that lowest (less than six), average (6–9) otherwise higher (10). To the next measure of union, i provided a changeable for if the pair had talked about matrimony or cohabitation; responses have been classified as the discussed none, discussed cohabitation or chatted about matrimony. (Participants whom reported having chatted about one another cohabitation and you may marriage was indeed provided regarding the relationships group.)
Heterogeneous birth-control effects within long term matchmaking may also help establish all the way down birth-control structure in the prolonged adolescent dating, even with deeper odds of previously-the means to access contraceptives. thirty-two, 33 Early in the day research has translated this selecting by the positing that people are willing to sporadically forgo birth control use in more severe relationship; thirty-two, 34 not, our very own abilities recommend that less birth prevention explore is concentrated for the long-emergency room label relationships characterized by highest disagreement minimizing relationship.
Acknowledgments
20. Ku sexy filipino girls L, Sonenstein Florida and Pleck JH, The fresh figure out of young men’s condom fool around with while in the and around the dating, Friends Considered Point of views, 1994, 26(6):246–251.